![]() ![]() Today, the company, which rebranded as Fluence this year, is out of the fish game, and about 80 percent of Fluence’s sales are with marijuana growers chiefly in the U.S. Īt first, they were apprehensive -“I was a child of Nancy Reagan I grew up during Just Say No,” says company co-founder Nick Klase -but soon they came around to the business opportunities, and shifted their views on marijuana. But a couple of years ago, company officials were approached by pot growers - as planters of all stripes are looking to figure out ways to accelerate growth beyond the conventional greenhouse. Not long ago, Fluence, then known as Build My LED and founded in 2012,specialized in aquarium lighting. The story of how Fluence, which specializes in high-efficient, ultra-bright light-emitting diodes (better known as LEDs) has ramped up to 40 employees, illuminates the spill-over effects of the marijuana industry and how it’s pushing energy efficient innovation. That’s because of booming sales to one of America’s biggest growth industries: cannabis. You can create one big disk, everything is stored on multiple drives, and you can grow and shrink the pool and drive at any time.Ĭonceptually, and I don't think I am alone here, I love the concepts of ZFS.For the third time in three years, Fluence Bioengineering, an Austin company that makes lights for indoor plant growing, has moved into a yet-bigger manufacturing facility. Plus, the disks don't need to be same etc. What I hate about ZFS is that, best I can tell, its only truly stable form on Solaris running on Oracle (formerly Sun) hardware. Sure, OpenSolaris exists, and FreeBSD has ZFS support, but reliability is generally said to be poor when on FreeBSD/OpenSolairs/Solaris on non oracle hardware. We run (exclusively at the moment) Window Server 2008 R2 servers. In Sum: if you love ZFS but want to run Windows Server 2008 R2 whats your best/coolest option(s)? There are a myrad of RAID cards out there: can someone recommend a setup that approaches ZFS flexibility? A setup where you can just add a disk to the pool and bam more storage without having to take the server down for rebuild? What is the "next best" DAS storage option for this OS? I can't find a ZFS implementation for windows, so that's out. PS: This is for in production systems, budget is on the order of 10k per system. Like others are saying there is nothing comparable to ZFS on Windows, so if you want to use ZFS it will have to be attached through the network in some form. 64-bit capable CPU (ZFS is practically useless on 32-bit).įrom what I gather the most important things to look out for are: If you check the compatibility of the hardware carefully you should also have no problems running it on non-Oracle hardware, in my (albeit limited) experience.1 - 1.5 GB of ECC RAM per TB of used storage.LSI 1068E based SAS/SATA HBA with IT firmware.I would recommend a Solaris-based OS over FreeBSD or Linux for performance and stability reasons, or if you need any of the features only recent ZFS versions support (like encryption). That means your OS options are Solaris 10, Solaris 11 Express, or one of the forks of OpenSolaris. Nexenta Core (or the more appliance-like NexentaStor), OpenIndiana and Schillix seem to be the most prominent. If you decide on an Oracle-supported OS the license costs are currently $1000 / socket for non-Oracle x86 hardware. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |